Joined
·
98 Posts
I decided to have a shooting session where I compared my four handguns side by side. Nothing fancy, just a B-27 Silhouette target at 10 yards, shooting for the 10X.
Handguns used:
1) Bersa Firestorm .380
2) Taurus 85 .38 Spcl. 2"
3) Glock 19 9mm
4) Kahr CW45 .45 ACP
Subjective results, your mileage may vary...
1) Bersa. Absolutely wonderful. Incredibly "pointable", fit my hand perfect, and held a tight fist sized 9 shot, rapid fire group at 10 yards. Wonderful shot recovery, instinctive shot placement. An absolute joy to shoot! Though only a couple hundred rounds through it now, I have had zero malfunctions (except for a factory mag with a BAD spring. Once replaced, 100%, even with Buffalo Bores).
2) Taurus 38, Oh-Hum at best! Two five shot strings gave me a dinner platter sized group. Not terribly pointable, and shot recovery lousy. NOT fun to shoot at all!
3) Glock. Considering I have about 10,000+ (if not more) rounds through this weapon since I got it as my carry piece as a detective on the SO starting in 1995, it still did not do ten shots as tight as the Bersa. I was using standard velocity 9mms, and got about half again larger group than the Bersa. It just doesn't point as well as the Bersa. Although, I have NEVER had a malfunction from the Glock, so it at least ties the Bersa for reliability.
4) Kahr 45 ACP: 8 shot string (7+1), group size smaller than the Taurus 38, but larger than the Glock! About dinner plate sized as opposed to dinner platter! The factory grip is terrible, and very un-ergonomic. An Uncle Mike's slip on finger groove sleeve helps a lot, but still not as good as the Glock, and nowhere close to the Bersa. At 20 ozs., even standard velocity 45s have a lot of "buck and roar" with not very good shot recovery. It has only been 90-95% reliable for me. (EDITED, when I realized malfunctions were one shot out of 10-15 rounds). Some of the problem was hollow-point, and some was factory mags. The Cotes ACT mags are better, but still not 100%.
Conclusions:
If I had to fight a war, or in a pitched gun battle, the Glock would of course be my first choice. It is a warfighters weapon.
For every day carry CCW, the FireStorm wins, especially with Buffalo Bore +P 90 grainers giving 288 ft pounds from the Bersa's 3.5 inch barrel.
The Taurus, I will probably never bother to carry anymore, since i only had it for an ankle holster weapon. The Bersa does that for me now.
The Kahr, well, I'll probably only carry that when I'm hiking or back packing in bear country. Loaded with Winchester Ranger 230 +P T-Series (Black Talon) LE ammo, it could at least hurt a bear with a 10X shot.
The absolute controllability and pointability of the Firestorm, and my confidence in my ability to do a 10 yard hostage (head) shot with it, just win the day. Nine shots of Buffalo Bore should solve any social situation that may arise! The only other pistol I shot this well was my CZ83 that I foolishly sold....
Handguns used:
1) Bersa Firestorm .380
2) Taurus 85 .38 Spcl. 2"
3) Glock 19 9mm
4) Kahr CW45 .45 ACP
Subjective results, your mileage may vary...
1) Bersa. Absolutely wonderful. Incredibly "pointable", fit my hand perfect, and held a tight fist sized 9 shot, rapid fire group at 10 yards. Wonderful shot recovery, instinctive shot placement. An absolute joy to shoot! Though only a couple hundred rounds through it now, I have had zero malfunctions (except for a factory mag with a BAD spring. Once replaced, 100%, even with Buffalo Bores).
2) Taurus 38, Oh-Hum at best! Two five shot strings gave me a dinner platter sized group. Not terribly pointable, and shot recovery lousy. NOT fun to shoot at all!
3) Glock. Considering I have about 10,000+ (if not more) rounds through this weapon since I got it as my carry piece as a detective on the SO starting in 1995, it still did not do ten shots as tight as the Bersa. I was using standard velocity 9mms, and got about half again larger group than the Bersa. It just doesn't point as well as the Bersa. Although, I have NEVER had a malfunction from the Glock, so it at least ties the Bersa for reliability.
4) Kahr 45 ACP: 8 shot string (7+1), group size smaller than the Taurus 38, but larger than the Glock! About dinner plate sized as opposed to dinner platter! The factory grip is terrible, and very un-ergonomic. An Uncle Mike's slip on finger groove sleeve helps a lot, but still not as good as the Glock, and nowhere close to the Bersa. At 20 ozs., even standard velocity 45s have a lot of "buck and roar" with not very good shot recovery. It has only been 90-95% reliable for me. (EDITED, when I realized malfunctions were one shot out of 10-15 rounds). Some of the problem was hollow-point, and some was factory mags. The Cotes ACT mags are better, but still not 100%.
Conclusions:
If I had to fight a war, or in a pitched gun battle, the Glock would of course be my first choice. It is a warfighters weapon.
For every day carry CCW, the FireStorm wins, especially with Buffalo Bore +P 90 grainers giving 288 ft pounds from the Bersa's 3.5 inch barrel.
The Taurus, I will probably never bother to carry anymore, since i only had it for an ankle holster weapon. The Bersa does that for me now.
The Kahr, well, I'll probably only carry that when I'm hiking or back packing in bear country. Loaded with Winchester Ranger 230 +P T-Series (Black Talon) LE ammo, it could at least hurt a bear with a 10X shot.
The absolute controllability and pointability of the Firestorm, and my confidence in my ability to do a 10 yard hostage (head) shot with it, just win the day. Nine shots of Buffalo Bore should solve any social situation that may arise! The only other pistol I shot this well was my CZ83 that I foolishly sold....